
July 7, 2017
(Note: The last paragraph of this post was edited to provide additional information on home rule reapportionment.
Yesterday’s blog post explained Milton’s Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) and its importance. Today’s blog explains Milton’s Charter, the other important cornerstone of Milton’s government. Milton’s Charter is akin to a municipal version of the United States Constitution. The Charter establishes the foundation and structure of Milton’s government. Municipal charters are granted by the Georgia General Assembly.
As with the U.S. Constitution, changing Milton’s Charter is serious matter. Changes to the charter should follow principles of good governance. Changes should be made through a process that is transparent, honest, fair, deliberative, rigorous, democratic, and participatory. Furthermore, the changes should be made through home rule, which the Georgia Municipal Association describes as “a doctrine under which municipalities and counties are delegated the autonomy to act with respect to their own affairs and without the need for specific legislative authorization.” In Milton, this means changes to the charter are accomplished either 1) through the Charter Commission or 2) through City Council. These are the two accepted/standard methods for changing the Charter.
The Charter Commission is a six-person appointed committee that meets every 5 years. (Think of the meeting of the Charter Commission as being like a quasi-constitutional convention.) Staff suggests charter changes that are then reviewed, revised, and approved by City Council. The suggested changes are then forwarded to the Charter Commission for review and revision. However, the Charter Commission has the authority to make other changes not suggested by staff and Council. The Charter Committee’s recommendations are returned to Council for ratification and then forwarded to the Georgia General Assembly for final approval, which is usually perfunctory.
The second standard means for changing the Charter is through legislative action by City Council. For example, reapportionment of election districts is typically effected through a City Council ordinance (Home Rule Reapportionment O.C.G.A. § 36-35-4.1.) For certain matters, such as laws that affect the exercise eminent domain, additional approval from the Georgia General Assembly is necessary; Milton’s City Council cannot act unilaterally to change the law in these matters. However, state assembly approval is intended to supplement, not supplant, action by the municipality. The default position is to permit cities to govern themselves without interference from the state, except in cases where intervention is needed to remedy obviously poor governance practices at the local level.
Tim Becker




