Property Tax Revolt

Fulton County Drops Bomb on Milton Taxpayers

Tax Bomb

June 2, 2017

Many supporters have contacted us about huge hikes in appraised values for many properties in Milton.  So today (and perhaps for several days), we are going off-topic.  Following are our quick impressions.

vegas_taxes

On Wednesday, Fulton County tax assessments were received in the mailboxes of Milton residents.  Many of these assessments were shockingly high.  In one Milton neighborhood, the mean and median appraised values increased by 56% and 56%, respectively.  It seems that the appraisals of unbuilt lots increased even more (than parcels with houses) . . . all the 2017 appraisals we’ve seen were more than 100% higher than 2016 appraisals.

Something has clearly gone haywire in the Fulton County Tax Assessor’s office.

Such steep increases in appraisals are inherently unfair and disrespectful to citizens.  There are two main issues.  First, there should be a cap (8%?  10%?) on how much appraisals can increase year over year. 

Second, many of the 2017 appraisals clearly bear no resemblance to reality.  In many neighborhoods, there are recent homes sales that provide comparisons for establishing appraised values.  For example, in one neighborhood, two homes with the exact same floor plans and similar lots received radically different appraised values.  The lower-valued home sold less than a year ago and appraised at the purchase price.  The higher-valued home appraised 55% higher than the lower-valued home that was purchased less than one year earlier!  And we are hearing the same story over and over again . . .

And so far, Fulton County’s response can best be described as defensive double-talk.

38423_a

First, Fulton County asserts that they are playing “catch-up.”  Interpretation:  In past we have been grossly incompetent, but now—trust us—we have gotten it right.  As readers might know, for years, the Fulton County Tax Assessors’s office has been a poster child for incompetence.  So now, they want us to believe that their most current assessments are correct.  Doubtful.

Second, Fulton County asserts that average appraised values only increased 13%, as if this is supposed to make us feel better in Milton.  However, unless you are math-challenged, you realize that a 13% average means that certain areas of North Fulton (e.g., Milton) are bearing the brunt of the tax increase.  To bring the average up to 13% means you have some real huge increases to certain taxpayers . . . those of us in Milton.

20111126_FNP001_0 (1)

Of course, Milton citizens have the right to appeal their tax assessments.  However, we predict that the appeals process will be a nightmare for citizens.  Given the blowback that is occurring, we anticipate a flood of appeals to the Fulton County Tax Assessor’s Office.  This means months and months of backlog, with the typical problems we find with the Tax Assessor’s office:  long call times, surly and incompetent claims processing representatives, lost documents, etc.  To fix this government-created fiasco, individual citizens will spend a lot of time and money and experience a lot of frustration.  You heard it here first!

google-international-tax-dodge

Rather than (time/money intensive, frustrating) bottoms-up appeals by individual citizens, Fulton County needs to find a top-down solution.  Fulton County needs to admit to its unfairness and incompetence in this matter.  Elected officials, in particular, need to step up and address this issue for their constituents.  Specifically, we call for the following:

  1. An admission by Fulton County that there may be serious problems plaguing our tax assessment process.
  2. A freeze on all assessments until a thorough investigation of the assessment process is completed. This means that 2016 assessments would remain in effect pending the outcome of an investigation.
  3. A report showing average appraisal increases by area, down to the subdivision. This will substantiate our claims that certain areas have been unfairly targeted for tax increases.
  4. Increased visibility into the algorithm used to assess property values. Citizens have a right to know “how the sausage gets made.”
  5. A full investigation of the tax assessment process by an independent third party.
  6. Calculation and dissemination of new assessments based on the recommendations from a third-party investigator.
  7. Reforms to the assessment process to make it fair to citizens. For example, we believe that there should be a cap on the rate at which assessments can increase year over year (subject to certain conditions—e.g., no improvements to the home, adjustments in square footage).

Grabbing money

What does this mean for Milton?

This money grab by Fulton County will have significant negative consequences for Milton.  It seems that appraisals on raw law were particularly steep.  We looked at 4 random parcels and following are the increases in appraisals:  128%, 134%, 204%, and 222% for an average of 172%.  This means there will be even more pressure (as if there were not enough) on owners of larger tracts of land to sell.  Milton has already lost 75% of its equestrian properties.  If these unjustified tax increases are allowed to stand, we will see an acceleration in already overheated development in Milton.

Of course, the impetus for the creation of the City of Milton was more local control.  Tax-payers wanted a government that better reflected their values and desires.  We wanted more of our tax dollars coming back to Milton for parks, police and fire protection, roads, etc.  However, with the latest property tax assessments, we are seeing that local control has some fairly strict limits.  Milton’s citizens need for the city, particularly elected officials, to step up and strongly challenge this patently unjustified jump in property taxes.

(We will likely publish a few more posts on this topic in the coming days.)

Milton Superstars

City Hall Superstar: Bob Buscemi

Following is a link to a Milton Herald profile of Bob Buscemi.  Bob is the City Architect for Milton.  We have a lot of great and hardworking staff at City Hall.  Bob is one of the superstars.  Bob has a real passion for architecture and for Milton.  He understands the original vision of Milton and the desire of Milton citizens to preserve that which makes Milton special.  He understands that the open land that remains in Milton increasingly presents development challenges (e.g., steep slopes).  Accordingly, Bob has been on the forefront of developing sensible and flexible rules/guidelines that preserve Milton’s unique character while protecting property rights.  For example, Bob was the motive force behind regulations to limit the vertical height of homes in Milton.  Such regulations were needed to ensure that homes built on steep slopes adhered to high architectural standards that preserve property values.  Bob is a real asset to the City.  Please take the time to introduce yourself to him and thank him for his contributions to making our City a great place to live.

Milton Herald Profile of Bob Buscemi

(In future posts, we will recognize other staff that are making a positive difference for citizens.)

Smart Land Use

Level the Playing Field For Citizens

fair-balance

May 31, 2017

Last night, a number of citizens attended an informational meeting for a new subdivision being proposed on Hamby Road.  Such informational meetings are one element of enhancements to our zoning process promoted by the Milton Coalition and recently approved by City Council.  Notification is provided by letter to nearby residents.  The meeting is also advertised by the City, so that citizens further away might attend.  Prior to the implementation of these informational meetings, all that a developer needed before building was a land disturbance permit (LDP).  Often, the first notification that citizens received of a new subdivision was the sound of chainsaw and the appearance of bulldozers.  Today, before a builder gets a LDP, she/he must appear before the public to explain his concept for the subdivision, answer questions, and listen to community input.  This is just one example of sensible enhancements to our zoning process that are being promoted by the Milton Coalition.

The City will be further enhancing this process by replacing the informational meeting with a Planning Commission hearing.  In the future, the Q&A mostly occur between the developer and the Planning Commission.  However, as with all public hearings, citizens will still be able to make a public statement that will be part of the public record.  The Milton Coalition hopes that the Planning Commission will allow some public input (e.g., submission of questions) during the hearing, so as not to lose the informal (and valuable) give-and-take with the developer now enjoyed by citizens.

The City needs to continue to seek ways to enhance our zoning process.  Such reform is one of the nine elements of the Milton Coalition’s Petition For Smart Development and Good Governance.  Specifically, our petition calls for “reforms needed to make the zoning process citizen-centric.”

Currently, citizens are at a decided disadvantage in zoning matters.  Developers have time, money, knowledge, highly paid attorneys/advisors, and connections that citizens are generally lacking. 

Rezoning hearings before City Council are a particularly frustrating experience for citizens.  Many citizens walk away from these meetings feeling frustrated, angry, and helpless.  At a rezoning hearing, each side is initially allowed 10 minutes to make their case.  To their credit, the Mayor and Council are always good about extending the 10 minutes to let all citizens speak.  (Equal time is then allocated for the developer, which is fair.)  However, once the public comment portion of the hearing is over, citizens have no other opportunities for input.  Thereafter, the discussion is developer-dominated.  Council questions the developer, thereby allowing the developer to continue to make his case.  This is frustrating to citizens, as developers often provide false or misleading information that frequently goes unchallenged.  Such was the case during the most recent council-approved rezoning.

It is important to understand that a (re)zoning hearing is a quasi-judicial proceeding.  However, in a real court, both sides are allowed the same opportunities to press their case.  There is back-and-forth exchange; examination and cross-examination.  However, the current practice in Milton only allows citizens to make the equivalent of an “opening statement,” but thereafter the developer’s position is presented largely unchallenged.  This is inherently unfair to citizens.

field

The Milton Coalition advocates that the City review its current hearing process for opportunities to level the playing field for citizens in opposition to a zoning application.  For example, at the end of the Council’s Q&A, the mayor can ask if any citizens want to address issues raised during the Q&A.  We know this may not be a common practice, but we would like to think that here in Milton we aspire to be the best.  And that means giving citizens equal time and opportunities to press their case.

More generally, the Milton Coalition advocates for a deep review of our entire zoning process to ensure that the playing field is truly level for citizens that oppose a zoning request.  While we applaud the recent changes the City has implemented, we believe that there are many more opportunities to make our zoning process more rigorous, fair, transparent, and citizen-friendly.  The City should identify and seize those opportunities.

(In future posts, we will have more to say about last night’s informational meeting with citizens.  Seminal issues around sewer and density were raised.)

Smart Land Use

Replace Horse on Milton’s Logo with a Bulldozer?

Milton Logo with Bulldozer

May 30, 2017

The latest rezoning of 3 parcels on Hopewell Road has outraged citizens.  In just the last seven days, our blog has received over 300 hits and 60 citizens have signed the Milton Coalition Petition For Smart Development and Good Governance.  The number of Milton citizens that have signed this petition has now surpassed 1,850; 639 have left comments.  One comment about replacing the horse on Milton’s logo with a bulldozer especially resonated with us.  Following are some of the recent comments made to us by citizens.

  • We will make sure these council members hear us loud & clear in their next election.
  • Milton is being bulldozed quickly by the developers & their friends on the city council. Cluster homes only benefit developers. Soon Milton will look no different than John’s Creek or Alpaharetta; completely over developed with no large tracts of land left. Take the horse off the city signs and replace it with a bulldozer.
  • Please please please do not make living in Milton any more of a nightmare. We have lived here more than 25 years and seen the destruction of a beautiful place firsthand.
  • Milton needs to preserve the rural environment that made it so desirable vs. compromising the community to further the tax base
  • Preserve Milton! This rezoning is unacceptable.
  • We’re already experiencing reduced property values as the result of high density housing in the Crabapple area. Enough!
  • Please control and limit more development. There is already far more housing developments than needed. Use what we have and keep Milton beautiful.
  • Feeling pinched enough to consider relocating away even though I moved here only 4 years ago from NJ. There are days that in the time it takes to commute here locally (7-8 mi), I could have traveled 4 times further in NJ.
  • If I wanted to live in Johns creek or Cumming, I would have moved there. We moved to Milton because of the rural feel, non-congested roads, and great schools. Adding high density properties will lower values because this will become just like all of the other areas that are much cheaper to live.
  • This is totally against why we voted for the city of Milton. Very disappointing.
  • Keep and respect Milton’s original zoning vision to ensure that it’s rural history, charm and the safe transportation of its residents are perpetuated.
  • I moved here due to the charm of Milton with the estate lots – not cluster homes!
  • I oppose cluster housing and specifically live here because it is not allowed!

images (2)

Council, please listen to your citizens ( . . . and staff . . . and the Planning Commission) and deny these reckless rezonings that violate the original vision of Milton and Milton’s own Comprehensive Land Use Plan!

City Events

Moving Memorial Day Commemoration at City Hall

memorialdayMay 29, 2017

The City of Milton put on a great Memorial Day commemoration at city hall today.  There were at least a couple of hundred people in attendance.  The plaza at city hall provided a nice venue for the ceremonies.  Highlights included:

  • A precision jump by a skydiver guiding down a 700 square foot American flag.
  • Great music by Conner Brooke Dryden.  The girl can sing!
  • A moving speech by Lt. Colonel Cary King about his experiences in Vietnam.

Honoring Our Veterans,

The Milton Coalition

18813832_1401872459851650_5999999912980777688_n

 

City Events, Good Governance

Honor Fallen Veterans With Good Governance

memorial-day.jpgMay 29, 2017

Memorial Day is a time to remember and honor those veterans who died in defense of our country and the principles upon which it was founded.  This remembrance will take many forms:  parades, laying of wreaths, planting of flags, and the like.  These are all appropriate ways to honor our fallen veterans.  However, the best way to honor veterans that made the ultimate sacrifice is to uphold the rights and principles they died defending.  The best way for our government to honor these veterans is provide good governance to citizens.  This means honoring and respecting the rights of all citizens:  to speak freely, to petition the government, and to freely assemble.  It means providing government that is clean and competent.  It means providing government that is fair, responsive, and transparent.  And it means understanding that government “derives its just powers from the consent of the governed.”  That is, citizens should be at the center of everything government does.  The Milton Coalition is committed to honoring our fallen veterans by ensuring that our local government reflects the will of its constituents and serves its citizens well.

Advocating For Citizens,

The Milton Coalition


A non-partisan group of concerned citizens advocating for clean, competent, courageous, and citizen-centric government

Milton - Our Home

A Fond Farewell to Wilbur and Rudy’s

c700x420.jpg

May 28, 2017

This is our second posting today.  We regret to inform our readers that Wilbur and Rudy’s at Birmingham Crossroads is closing.  A farewell celebration with bbq, live music, and more will be held on June 3rd.  Following is a link to more information:

Wilbur and Rudy’s Website

Additional information will be posted at Wilbur and Rudy’s Facebook page regarding the wind down of its operations and the farewell celebration.

Wilbur and Rudy’s Facebook Page

Our thanks to Beth and Ryan for creating such a charming gathering spot for the community.

new-logo

 

Smart Land Use

Hopewell Rezoning’s Silver Lining: Clarity on Development Issues

downloadCitizens, we know you are frustrated to learn that Council has approved a rezoning to allow higher density on 3 parcels on Hopewell Road.  This approval comes despite overwhelming citizen opposition to such rezonings and other developer schemes to skirt Milton’s current zoning to achieve higher density and inflated profits.  However, there is silver lining in Council’s rezoning approval . . . the debate over land use in Milton has been clearly defined:

  • Either the Comprehensive Land Use Plan (CLUP) will be followed or not. The CLUP is Milton’s strategic plan for land use.  It was just approved by Council 7 months ago.  The CLUP is developed through a rigorous year-long process by a 17-member committee.  It involves a lot of citizen input.  The CLUP is City Council’s contract with citizens regarding land use.  However, with the latest rezoning, the CLUP was summarily disregarded.
  • Either Milton’s Intergovernmental Agreement (IGA) with Fulton County regarding sewer will be followed or not. The IGA governs where sewer is allowed.  It was a compromise developed through a lot of debate and hard work.  The IGA was also summarily disregarded by the latest rezoning.
  • Either the Planning Commission’s recommendations will be seriously considered or not. The latest rezoning is just the latest example of Council overruling the Planning Commission, who (along with staff) unanimously recommended denial of the rezoning.  The Planning Commission cited the CLUP and IGA in its decision.  The Planning Commission always respects the Rule of Law; Council often does not.
  • Either we will reject sewer extension (including authorizing residential community septic) or not. The latest rezoning will require Council to approve another ordinance to extend sewer to the subject property.  During Council’s rezoning discussion, one council member suggested that Council revisit the sewer map to “clean it up.”  Citizens, beware!  This is likely a ploy to extend sewer under the guise of “correcting” the sewer map.
  • Either Council will focus on solving the problems of Milton (like traffic congestion) or it will be consumed with ridiculous zoning requests into eternity. Council needs to draw a bright line in the sand regarding developers’ rezonings and variances that increase density:  Zero Tolerance.  The latest rezoning has now opened the door to a new wave of developer requests.  This means Council and City staff will spend inordinate amounts of time and resources on these requests vs. solving the City’s worsening problems, such as traffic congestion and strain on our infrastructure.
  • Either Council will respect the views of citizens or not. After all, how many petitions will it take to convince Council to listen to us?  How many times do we need to pack Council chambers to get our point across?  How many letters do we have to write before our message is received?

battle_lines

The Hopewell rezoning has provided clarity to citizens.  That is good.  Citizens will have a choice at the ballot box in 5 months.  Three council members fall clearly on the side of developers; they vote for nearly every developer request, no matter how ridiculous, that comes before them.  They are a lost cause.  One council member falls clearly on the side of citizens; he will never vote for any developer request that increases density.  Unfortunately, there are 3 council members straddling the divide who will need to clarify their positions in the coming months; hopefully, they will side with citizens.

Milton City Council

Council Composition Does Not Reflect Community Composition

download

May 27, 2017

Yesterday’s blog discussed problems in the community that are not being addressed by Council.  Many of these problems are directly caused by unfettered development in Milton.  Accordingly, density giveaways, such as we witnessed with the latest rezoning on Hopewell Road, are perplexing to citizens.  How is it that Council’s priorities are often so different from the priorities of citizens?  Aren’t council members stuck in the same traffic?  Sending their kids to the same overcrowded schools?  Subject to the same threat to their property values?  The answer is mostly NO.

Consider traffic congestion, for example.  All of the current Council members mostly work from home, commute to neighboring cities, or work locally.  They do not suffer the long commutes endured by many of their constituents . . . commutes that make it virtually impossible to attend and participate in Council meetings that commence at 6 pm.

Overcrowded schools are also not a personal concern of most Council members.  Only 2 Council members have kids enrolled in the local public schools.  For the other 5 Council members, they either never had kids enrolled in our local schools or their kids have long since graduated.

Lastly, all of our current council members are (or were recently) homeowners, so they are subject to the same risk of lowered property values as ordinary citizens.  However, 6 out of 7 Council members work in the development industry or are tied to it through business relationships or large campaign contributions.  The benefits they receive from development in Milton far outweigh any diminishment in their property values resulting from that development.  Some council members are able to separate their decision-making from their ties to development; others clearly are not.

So it is fair to say that many council members do not personally feel the pain of the ordinary citizen.  It is time to change the composition of Council to more closely resemble the community of Milton.  It is time to elect council members whose priorities align with the priorities of citizens.

Smart Land Use

High Density = Traffic Congestion, Overcrowded Schools, and Lower Property Values

May 26, 2017

Rezoning = Higher Density = Higher Developer Profits – Lower Citizen Quality of Life

The above “equations” concisely describe residential rezoning in Milton.  Nearly every rezoning request submitted to Council involves a developer asking for higher density than the current zoning, usually AG-1, allows.  Higher density means more housing units per acre of land.  And of course, higher density means higher developer profits, because revenues are increased and certain fixed costs get distributed across more housing units.  And higher density almost certainly means a lower quality of life for citizens . . . no matter where you live in Milton.  We all drive on the same roads and we send our kids to the same schools and we all want to protect our investment in our homes.

So let’s consider the current situation in Milton

Traffic Congestion.

gallery-1444330260-gridlock-1015

Traffic jams have become ubiquitous in Milton.  Some of us have difficulty even making a right turn out of our subdivisions or driveways.  And a left turn?  Forget it . . . that is a suicide mission.  Stop sign lines are getting longer and longer.  Some traffic circles, built to facilitate traffic flow, have already become overwhelmed to the point where the city is considering technologies (i.e., stop lights) to meter flow into the traffic circles.  And cut-through traffic represents a growing danger to public safety, as drivers seek to shave time off their commute.  At Birmingham Crossroads, 70 vehicles per hour cut through the Publix parking lot during the evening rush hour.

So why would Council ever approve a rezoning that puts more cars on the road?

Overcrowded Schools.

th

The excellent public schools are a key reason that many of us move to Milton.  Despite the recent construction of new schools and expansion of existing schools, Milton’s schools are again facing overcrowding.  School board members have stated that the school system cannot keep up with the population increases.  Portables are installed or being planned for a number of schools.  School overcrowding is directly correlated with school quality.  And school quality is directly correlated with property values.  It is interesting to note that all 5 council members voting for the recent rezoning do not have school-age children.

So why would council ever approve a rezoning that puts even more students in our schools?

Lower Property Values.

ThinkstockPhotos-101049081-1

Americans’ housing wealth at $25.6T nationally exceeds Americans’ $21.2T wealth in their stock and bond portfolios.  For the average American, their home is far and away their largest investment.  And the value of that investment is highly correlated to the community’s quality of life (e.g., traffic congestion) and school quality.  You do not have to go far to see the folly in reckless development.  Despite constructing quasi-superhighways everywhere, John’s Creek’s traffic is paralyzed by gridlock, even in the middle of the day and on weekends.  Despite relatively new housing stock, Alpharetta and Roswell are plagued with blighted, high-crime areas.  Their answer to this blight is double down on high density.  And Forsyth County is Exhibit A in the idiocy of extending sewer . . . high density subdivisions are popping up like mushrooms after a good rain.  Milton’s real estate agents understand these issues best and many of them are the Milton Coalition staunchest supporters.

So why would council ever approve a rezoning that threatens property values of Milton?

So if traffic congestion (and other quality of life issues), overcrowded schools, and property values are a concern, Milton citizens need start considering replacing Council members that are approving density giveaways.

Tomorrow, we will explore how the priorities of certain Council members differ from the priorities (described above) of most citizens.